why do twilight readers defend the movie?

i recently watched the first twilight movie with my boyfriend.  neither of us had read the books, but we finally wanted to know what all the fuss was about.  it was absolutely fucking terrible.  the movie immediately bombards you with all sorts of steamy, intense and profound emotions.  these emotions are built on little to no foundation.  the movie lacked a structure of any sort.  the main characters were poorly developed and at the end of it i was in a word, confused.

it is common knowledge that when a book is turned into a movie, it sucks.  it goes hand in hand that those who have read the book generally hate the movie.  they chastise the movie for being so shallow, so hollywood.

movies butcher books and everybody knows it.

so why then do those who have read the books in the twilight series tell me, “it’s just that you don’t really know the whole story.”  “the movie would make more sense to you if you had read the book.”  “well, if you haven’t read the book then you’re probably not really getting everything.”

yeah, just like the french revolutionary war would make more sense if i had ever bothered to read a god damn history book.  but i’ll tell you what.  if i rented a movie about the french revolutionary war, it would probably bother to lend some insight.  i paid blockbuster $4.00 to give me a story that i didn’t have to read a book to get.  it was not my responsibility to go the extra mile to understand the story.  i already gave you the $4.00.  that was the deal blockbuster.  that’s the whole point of a fucking movie.

    • KatyL
    • February 24th, 2010

    That’s a good point… I keep hearing the same thing. If only you had also wasted some of your time reading the books, dummy.

    • betholomew
    • February 24th, 2010

    Heads up. The books are terrible, too.

    It’s thousands of pages of “chagrin”, “dazzle”, and “I’ll never lave you.”

    Guilty pleasure, for sure.

    But, if people are actually defending this “saga”, I don’t know who gave them a chair high enough to reach the computer.

    • ebert
    • February 25th, 2010

    I thought the movie sucked too.

    • siskell
    • February 25th, 2010

    i liked how instead of saying any words at all they just stared each other down, ever so slightly twitching their lips and tongue. gross.

    • siskell
    • February 25th, 2010

    btw in this picture he looks not like a vampire but more like frankenstein. not quite as bad off in the looks department but somehow is more internally tortured. fucking baby.

    • betholomew
    • February 27th, 2010

    He looks like an angry guy who rolled around in chalk.

    • sandy
    • February 28th, 2010

    why do twilight readers defend the movie?
    simple answer, because everyone in the movie is super sexy!

  1. No trackbacks yet.